Satellite operators
Flight dynamics, collision-avoidance policy, and the people who decide how much autonomy a system is given.
45 INTERVIEWS · CO-DESIGN SESSIONS
The empirical core of this project is what practitioners actually do when an autonomous system commits to a manoeuvre. That cannot be read out of the treaties, so we ask the people who operate, insure, track and standardise.
Flight dynamics, collision-avoidance policy, and the people who decide how much autonomy a system is given.
How autonomy is priced, what conditions are imposed, and what evidence a claim requires after an incident.
Conjunction screening, data quality, and the terms on which warnings are shared or withheld.
Those drafting technical norms, and those licensing operators against them.
A conversation rather than a questionnaire, arranged at your convenience and held remotely unless you prefer otherwise.
Working on draft instruments with others in the sector, on the understanding that participants shape the text rather than review a finished document.
Participants can see how their contribution is characterised before it is published.
Commercial sensitivity is taken seriously. Contributions can be attributed, attributed by sector only, or kept unattributed, and that choice is yours to change up to publication.
The study is conducted under University of Aberdeen research ethics approval. Participant information and consent documents are provided before any interview.
ETHICS REFERENCE TO FOLLOW
PARTICIPANT INFORMATION SHEET TO FOLLOW